Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/1710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMaddumage, W. U-
dc.contributor.authorAbeyasighe, K. Y-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, M. S. M-
dc.contributor.authorAttalage, R, A-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, P-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-16T10:51:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-16T10:51:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMaddumage W.W., Abeyashige K.I., Perera M.S., Attalage R.A., Kelly P. Comparison of fuel consumption and emission levels for conventional and hybrid transmission configurations, taking into account driving cycles and the degree of hybridization. SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY . 2020;19(1):20-33. https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2020-19-1-20-33 For quote:en_US
dc.identifier.issn2227-1031-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/1710-
dc.description.abstractHybrid electric powertrains in automotive applications aim to improve emissions and fuel economy with respect to conventional internal combustion engine vehicles. Variety of design scenarios need to be addressed in designing a hybrid electric vehicle to achieve desired design objectives such as fuel consumption and exhaust gas emissions. The work in this paper presents an analysis of the design objectives for an automobile powertrain with respect to different design scenarios, i. e. target drive cycle and degree of hybridization. Toward these ends, four powertrain configuration models (i. e. internal combustion engine, series, parallel and complex hybrid powertrain configurations) of a small vehicle (motorized threewheeler) are developed using Model Advisor software and simulated with varied drive cycles and degrees of hybridization. Firstly, the impact of vehicle power control strategy and operational characteristics of the different powertrain configurations are investigated with respect to exhaust gas emissions and fuel consumption. Secondly, the drive cycles are scaled according to kinetic intensity and the relationship between fuel consumption and drive cycles is assessed. Thirdly, three fuel consumption models are developed so that fuel consumption values for a real-world drive cycle may be predicted in regard to each powertrain configuration. The results show that when compared with a conventional powertrain fuel consumption is lower in hybrid vehicles. This work led to the surprisingly result showing higher CO emission levels with hybrid vehicles. Furthermore, fuel consumption of all four powertrains showed a strong correlation with kinetic intensity values of selected drive cycles. It was found that with varied drive cycles the average fuel advantage for each was: series 23 %, parallel 21 %, and complex hybrids 33 %, compared to an IC engine powertrain. The study reveals that performance of hybrid configurations vary significantly with drive cycle and degree of hybridization. The paper also suggests future areas of study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherБелорусский национальный технический университетen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesНаука и техника;Issue 1-
dc.subject: hybrid electric vehicleen_US
dc.subjectvehicle performanceen_US
dc.subjectemissionsen_US
dc.subjectfuel economyen_US
dc.subjectdriving cycleen_US
dc.subjectdegree of hybridizationen_US
dc.subjectpowertrain simulationen_US
dc.subjectconventional vehicleen_US
dc.subjectthree wheeleren_US
dc.titleComparing fuel consumption and emission levels of hybrid powertrain configurations and a conventional powertrain in varied drive cycles and degree of hybridizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2020-19-1-20-33en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers - SLIIT Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2278-3871-1-SM.pdf1.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.