Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/2342
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYaksic, E-
dc.contributor.authorAllred, T. B-
dc.contributor.authorDrakulic, C-
dc.contributor.authorMooney, R-
dc.contributor.authorDe Silva, R-
dc.contributor.authorGeyer, P-
dc.contributor.authorWills, A-
dc.contributor.authorComerford, C-
dc.contributor.authorRanger, R-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-17T09:57:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-17T09:57:07Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-02-
dc.identifier.citationEnzo Yaksic, Tara Bulut Allred, Christa Drakulic, Robyn Mooney, Raneesha De Silva, Penny Geyer, Angelica Wills, Caroline Comerford & Rebekah Ranger (2021) How much damage do serial homicide offenders wrought while the innocent rot in prison? A tabulation of preventable deaths as outcomes of sentinel events, Psychology, Crime & Law, 27:1, 76-88, DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774590en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/2342-
dc.description.abstractThe criminal justice system has allowed serial homicide offenders (SHOs) to commit additional homicides by failing to identify them after their initial homicide. Recidivism has been possible in instances where the SHO benefited from the wrongful incarceration of an innocent person for one of their homicides. Data from the National Registry of Exonerations was utilized to tabulate the full extent of these sentinel events, defined as the number of deaths that could have been prevented. Additional research was conducted to identify where victims fell in the offender’s killing sequence. This ancillary data revealed the number of victims whose deaths could have been prevented had the offender been apprehended earlier in their series of homicides. Sixty-two SHOs were responsible for 249 deaths, 114 of which were committed after an innocent person was incarcerated for the SHO’s initial homicide. To prevent further loss of life, law enforcement must: act upon accurate information; lower the SHO evidentiary threshold; prevent personal bias from influencing investigative steps; obtain training in the behavior of SHOs; admit mistakes; and re-examine convictions if wrongdoing is suspected.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPsychology, Crime & Law;Volume 27 Issue 1 Pages 76-88-
dc.subjectsentinel eventen_US
dc.subjectpolicingen_US
dc.subjectpreventable homicideen_US
dc.subjectserial homicide offenderen_US
dc.subjectwrongful convictionen_US
dc.subjectExonerationen_US
dc.titleHow much damage do serial homicide offenders wrought while the innocent rot in prison? A tabulation of preventable deaths as outcomes of sentinel eventsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1068316X.2020.1774590en_US
Appears in Collections:Research Papers
Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1068316X.2020.pdf
  Until 2050-12-31
1.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.