Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/2615
Title: Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)
Authors: Meddage, P
Ekanayake, I
Perera, U. S
Azamathulla, H
Md Said, M. A
Rathnayake, U
Keywords: explainable machine learning
pressure coefficient
shapley additive explanation
tree-based machine learning
gable-roofed low-rise building
Issue Date: 29-May-2022
Citation: Meddage, Pasindu & Ekanayake, Imesh & Perera, Udara & Azamathulla, Hazi & Md Said, Md Azlin & Rathnayake, Upaka. (2022). Interpretation of Machine-Learning-Based (Black-box) Wind Pressure Predictions for Low-Rise Gable-Roofed Buildings Using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Buildings. 12. 734. 10.3390/buildings12060734.
Series/Report no.: Buildings;12(6):734
Abstract: Conventional methods of estimating pressure coefficients of buildings retain time and cost constraints. Recently, machine learning (ML) has been successfully established to predict wind pressure coefficients. However, regardless of the accuracy, ML models are incompetent in providing end-users’ confidence as a result of the black-box nature of predictions. In this study, we employed tree-based regression models (Decision Tree, XGBoost, Extra-tree, LightGBM) to predict surface-averaged mean pressure coefficient (Cp,mean), fluctuation pressure coefficient (Cp,rms), and peak pressure coefficient (Cp,peak) of low-rise gable-roofed buildings. The accuracy of models was verified using Tokyo Polytechnic University (TPU) wind tunnel data. Subsequently, we used Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) to explain the black-box nature of the ML predictions. The comparison revealed that tree-based models are efficient and accurate in wind-predicting pressure coefficients. Interestingly, SHAP provided human-comprehensible explanations for the interaction of variables, the importance of features towards the outcome, and the underlying reasoning behind the predictions. Moreover, SHAP confirmed that tree-based predictions adhere to the flow physics of wind engineering, advancing the fidelity of ML-based predictions.
URI: http://rda.sliit.lk/handle/123456789/2615
ISSN: 2075-5309
Appears in Collections:Department of Civil Engineering
Research Papers - Department of Civil Engineering
Research Papers - Open Access Research
Research Papers - SLIIT Staff Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
buildings-12-00734-v2.pdf8.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.